Single vs. Multi-Family Office — Which is Right for You?

Published: 2025-05-21 Source: WealthShield Author: Toms
Choosing between a single-family office (SFO) and multi-family office (MFO) depends on assets under management, complexity of needs, and long-term strategy. This guide helps families assess which model fits best in 2025.


Choosing between a single-family office (SFO) and multi-family office (MFO) depends on assets under management, complexity of needs, and long-term strategy. This guide helps families assess which model fits best in 2025.

Understanding the Core Differences

SFOs serve one ultra-wealthy family and offer full control, while MFOs cater to multiple families and provide shared services and cost efficiencies.

Cost Considerations

Running an SFO often requires $100M+ in assets. MFOs are more flexible, often with entry thresholds starting at $10M–$25M.

Customization vs. Standardization

SFOs provide tailor-made governance, reporting, and investment models. MFOs rely on standardized processes but increasingly offer modular services.

Risk Management & Privacy

SFOs offer complete discretion but may lack institutional-grade controls. MFOs offer robust frameworks but share infrastructure with others.

Editor's Note:

If you value control, bespoke service, and can justify the cost, SFOs shine. Otherwise, MFOs offer a strong alternative for wealthy families looking to scale without operational burden.

FAQs

  1. What is the AUM threshold to start an SFO? Typically $100M+, though some start around $50M with lean setups.
  2. Are MFOs less secure? No. Many have advanced cybersecurity and regulatory compliance, just shared systems.
  3. Can you convert from MFO to SFO later? Yes. Some families begin with an MFO and spin off an SFO as their needs grow.
  4. Do MFOs offer estate planning? Most full-service MFOs include estate, tax, and legal advisory as part of their package.
  5. Are family offices only in the West? Not anymore. Asia, Middle East, and Latin America are seeing strong FO growth.

User Comments

  • Thomas L.: This is exactly the debate we’re having now. Very timely.
  • Ivy W.: I thought MFOs were only for the ultra-rich. Eye-opener!
  • Dan B.: Thanks for outlining the AUM thresholds. That’s always the awkward question.
  • Liam P.: We started with an MFO. Eventually moved to a lean SFO—it was worth it.
  • Rachel S.: I’d love to see a comparison table between SFO/MFO services.

(Editors: admin)